On Friday morning, a driverless Waymo vehicle, for reasons unknown, rolled into a patch of wet cement on the grounds of Laguna Honda Hospital — and sank in. It was, for onlookers, a source of much mirth and cellphone picture-taking.
A witness tells your humble narrator that the wet cement ought to have been better demarcated with barricades — but, also, that a human driver would never, ever have made this mistake.
Two weeks prior, an official with San Francisco International Airport wrote to the Planning Department. “The City and County of San Francisco, by and through the San Francisco Airport Commission proposes to approve a permit allowing autonomous vehicle companies to map the roads at San Francisco International Airport, ” it read.
“Under the Proposed Project, autonomous vehicle companies would be allowed to deploy up to two autonomous vehicles operated by human drivers to map the publicly accessible roads at the Airport…”
Planning determined this action would be exempt from the dreaded California Environmental Quality Act. You’re not going to believe this, but there is, presently, not a “Mapping the airport for driverless cars” permit. One will be created and, presumably, issued.
But not without a fight.
San Francisco International Airport is, if not the Holy Grail, certainly a Holy Grail for autonomous vehicle companies. It is a place where they can get rich — or, in the case of Cruise, die tryin’. Every step of autonomous vehicle companies’ sequential Bay Area expansion plans appears poised to capture SFO.
If Waymo had its way, this would be unfolding at a much quicker pace. Last year, we wrote how SFO and Waymo were moving forward with the issuance of a mapping permit — a clear precursor to other “phases” and “timelines” posited by the autonomous vehicle company for service to SFO. But the chipper back and forth abruptly turned cold and SFO quashed all talk of mapping the airport.
But the times, they are a-changing. A recent public records request reveals that Waymo and SFO officials, like Herb Caen and Willie Brown in the days of yore, have a standing meeting: “SFO // Waymo Bi-weekly Connect,” reads one subject line.
Mapping, of course, is not just done for the benefit of future cartographers. Waymo’s “phases” and “timelines” all lead to driverless vehicles picking you up and dropping you off at SFO (but not if you live in Fremont or somewhere they don’t yet go).
Waymo has every intention of rolling into SFO — and sinking in.
At which site will tensions between Waymo, the pugnacious Teamsters union and vestiges of city government take off? Naturally, it’s the airport.
In October, the Teamsters filed an ethics complaint charging Waymo with unregistered lobbying of SFO. Everything obtained in a subsequent records request reveals the company is still doing a great deal of lobbying at SFO — but now doing it by the book.
The airport is a flashpoint for the larger war between the union representing thousands and thousands of drivers and the autonomous vehicle companies that will do away with thousands and thousands of drivers. And the brewing conflict here isn’t so much about the airport itself, but what comes next.
SFO is a Holy Grail for driverless vehicles, but another even Holier Grail is commercial logistics delivery like UPS — a source of scads of well-paid teamster jobs. The teamsters are fighting here at the airport not so much about goings on at SFO but to prevent — or, more realistically, hinder — autonomous vehicle companies’ conquest of the airport en route to setting their sights on parcel delivery.
Expect the Teamsters and their allies in government to view the airport mapping permit as a camel’s nose situation — except it’s not a camel coming into the tent but a fleet of camels. And those camels want to take humans’ union jobs.
Mark Gleason, a retired teamster and a spokesman for Joint Council 7 representing 18 local unions, is clear that he and his brethren view this as an existential battle. The struggle takes on almost Churchillian terms: They shall fight Waymo on the beaches, they shall fight on the landing grounds, they shall fight in the fields and in the streets, they shall fight in the hills; they shall never surrender.
So it’s not unreasonable to expect the Teamsters — and their allies in government — to pull the parking brake on Waymo’s drive toward SFO. Nor is it unreasonable to expect instances like Friday’s Waymo foray into the wet cement to be brought up again and again regarding the pitfalls facing a fleet of robot drivers handling the Thanksgiving or Christmas airport driving gauntlet.
Next time you’re at SFO and have a minute, try counting the Ubers, Lyfts and other ride-hail vehicles. The airport gets $5.50 for each one. Budget numbers are big at SFO — the better part of $1 million yearly is spent here on toilet paper alone. But $5.50 a pop does add up: It’s a small slice of the airport’s budget, but $50 million is real money.
So, there’s gold in them thar Waymos for SFO. And there’s gold in them thar SFO for Waymo. But if the airport and Waymo are getting the gold mine in this deal, South Bay leaders are bemoaning that they’re getting the shaft.
When asked what the South Bay would get out of Waymo’s expansion to the airport, San Mateo County Supervisor David Canepa pauses and says “Thank you. Thank you for asking that question. Thank you for raising this issue.”
This, clearly, has been bothering him for a while. Then he answers: “Nothing much. But there is shared responsibility and should be shared funding.” Few people figure to be taking autonomous vehicles to and from SFO to San Mateo. SFO is actually situated in San Mateo County, but there is no airport-related vehicle fee going into San Mateo coffers. Canepa notes that there is a revenue-sharing agreement with his county and the SFO Grand Hyatt. But, in the case of autonomous vehicles rolling into SFO, he worries that all San Mateo County will get is the growing pains of robotaxis working out the kinks — at freeway speed.
Anders Fung, the mayor of Millbrae, adds that “technology is a good thing. But everybody needs to pay their fair share.”
South Bay leaders, like Rodney Dangerfield, complain they don’t get no respect. And, in this game, you must buy respect.
So, as Waymo continues to roll toward SFO, any number of natural adversaries will be happy to toss up roadblocks. Any number of natural adversaries will be happy to stand athwart history, yelling stop.
Whether Waymo’s road is smooth or more akin to rolling through wet cement remains to be seen.
Be the first to leave a comment