Friend of accused killer’s sister, new DNA expert both testify 

[ad_1] Today marked the opening of defense arguments in the trial of Nima Momeni, who is accused of stabbing Cash App founder Bob Lee to death last year. Momeni’s attorneys today called to the stand Greg Hampikian, a DNA expert — who claimed there was a “serious problem” with the DNA on the knife allegedly…

Photographer

[ad_1]

Today marked the opening of defense arguments in the trial of Nima Momeni, who is accused of stabbing Cash App founder Bob Lee to death last year. Momeni’s attorneys today called to the stand Greg Hampikian, a DNA expert — who claimed there was a “serious problem” with the DNA on the knife allegedly used to kill Lee. 

Hampikian testified that an important footnote was left off the analysis that primarily placed Momeni’s DNA on the handle of the weapon. That footnote would have included the possibility of a false reading. 

Momeni is accused of stabbing Bob Lee to death over the perception of allegedly inappropriate behavior with Momeni’s sister, Khazar, earlier that day on April 3, 2023. While Lee did see Momeni’s sister before the stabbing, Momeni’s defense attorneys have attempted to discredit that motive by claiming Momeni only took issue with another man, Jeremy Boivin, for giving drugs to Khazar and purportedly sexually assaulting her. 

Perhaps to bolster this argument, or simply to give a sense of the involved parties’ behavior the day before the stabbing, defense attorneys today also called Aranza Villegas. She is a friend of Khazar Momeni, who had seen both Momeni siblings and Boivin the evening before the stabbing.  

Another look at DNA

DNA analysis from the handle of the knife, which was found near the scene where Lee was fatally stabbed, had Momeni’s DNA on it. The blade, meanwhile, had Lee’s DNA on it. 

Much of Hampikian’s testimony today, however, served to emphasize the variability and uncertainty of DNA evidence. Hampikian, who has extensive experience as a biological sciences professor at Boise State University and founded the Idaho Innocence Project, reportedly helped to exonerate Amanda Knox of murdering her roommate in 2007. He was paid upwards of $12,000 to review evidence and testify in this trial. 

“Nothing in a DNA likelihood ratio is an absolute identification of a person,” Hampikian said. “It is information that helps the triers of fact make their own conclusions.” 

Prosecutors previously showed the jury the San Francisco crime lab’s analysis of the DNA in this case, but defense attorneys revealed today that prosecutors left off a footnote about possible “false” results. 

While Momeni’s DNA was a highly likely match to 99 percent of the DNA on the knife handle, the other 1 percent sample showed a likelihood that fell into a margin of error. 

[ad_2]

Source: missionlocal.org